Exhibit 1.01

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

Conflict Minerals Report

For the Reporting Period from January 1 to December 31, 2014

This Conflict Minerals Report for Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. covers the reporting period from January 1 to December 31, 2014 and has been prepared in accordance with Rule 13p-1 (the “Conflict Minerals Rule”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Introduction

The Democratic Republic of the Congo (the “DRC”) and its adjoining countries (i.e., those countries that share an internationally recognized border with the DRC) have extensive deposits of certain minerals, including tantalum, tin, tungsten and gold. These minerals are referred to as “conflict minerals” in the Conflict Minerals Rule and are commonly used in the manufacturing of many consumer products. The Conflict Minerals Rule imposes disclosure and reporting requirements on U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) registrants, like us, that manufacture, or contract to manufacture, products that contain conflict minerals that are necessary to the functionality or production of those products.

References in this Conflict Minerals Report to “AMD,” “we,” “us” or “our” mean Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and our consolidated subsidiaries, “conflict minerals” means columbite-tantalite (coltan), cassiterite, gold, wolframite and their derivatives, which are limited to tantalum, tin and tungsten, and “armed groups” means an armed group that is identified as a perpetrator of serious human rights abuses in annual Country Reports on Human Rights Practices under sections 116(d) and 502B(b) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 relating to the DRC or an adjoining country.

Background of our Conflict Minerals Program

AMD has actively engaged with our customers and suppliers for several years with respect to the use of conflict minerals. Our actions stem from our responsible and inclusive culture and longstanding leadership in corporate responsibility.

Industry Leadership. We have led industry efforts to address conflict minerals; an AMD employee serves as a board member and is Chairman emeritus of the Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition (“EICC”) and serves as member of the EICC’s Steering Committee. Additionally, AMD is an active contributor to the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative (“CFSI”), an initiative organized by the EICC and the Global e-Sustainability Initiative. Our leadership and contributions have helped the CFSI develop standards and tools that benefit all companies working to break the link between minerals trade and conflict.

Multi-Stakeholder Engagement. AMD was a founder and an AMD employee served as co-chair (with the Enough Project and Responsible Sourcing Network) of the Multi-Stakeholder Group (the “MSG”). The MSG is a coalition of socially responsible non-profit groups, investors and companies. By working with stakeholder groups with different perspectives on this issue, the MSG was able to forge consensus positions on the emerging legislative and regulatory policy. The MSG drafted several letters to the SEC to assist with the development of the proposed and final Conflict Minerals Rule. In addition, AMD testified at a roundtable on the proposed Conflict Minerals Rule in October 2011.

We are also a founding member of the Public Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade, which provides funding and coordination support to organizations working within the DRC region to develop verifiable conflict-free supply chains, align chain-of-custody programs and practices, encourage responsible sourcing from the DRC region, promote transparency and bolster in-region civil society and governmental capacity.

1

Transparency. A hallmark of our corporate responsibility program and our leadership on conflict minerals is transparency. In addition to the efforts described under “Due Diligence—Publicly Report on our Supply Chain Due Diligence,” below, we have also provided briefings for socially responsible investors on conflict minerals and our transparency on this matter and considered their feedback.

Background of our Business and Products

We are a global semiconductor company with facilities worldwide. Within the global semiconductor industry, we offer primarily:

For a detailed description of our business and products, see “Part I, Item 1—Business” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 27, 2014, filed with the SEC. This Conflict Minerals Report covers all of our products.

Due Diligence

Design of our Due Diligence Framework

We designed our due diligence measures to conform, in all material respects, to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, Second Edition, including the related supplements on gold, tantalum, tin and tungsten (the “OECD Guidance”). The OECD Guidance is an internationally recognized due diligence framework established following due-process procedures, including the broad distribution of the framework for public comment, and is consistent with the criteria standards in the Government Auditing Standards established by the Comptroller General of the United States.

The design of our due diligence measures encompasses (i) establishing internal management systems, (ii) identifying and assessing risks in our supply chain, (iii) designing and implementing a response to identified risks, (iv) independent third-party audits of smelter or refiner due diligence practices, and (v) publicly reporting on our supply chain due diligence.

Description of our Due Diligence Measures

Establishing Internal Management Systems. We have established an internal AMD conflict minerals team that is responsible for the development of and oversees our conflict minerals policy, due diligence and internal management systems to implement our conflict minerals policy. Our conflict minerals policy is available at www.amd.com/conflictminerals. Our conflict minerals team is headed by our Corporate Vice President, Global Supply Management, and includes representatives from our global supply management, integrated supply chain, public affairs, information technology, law and finance departments.

2

To gain transparency and information on the conflict minerals in our supply chain, we asked each of our direct suppliers who contributed materials or manufacturing services that directly impacted or became a part of our products, such as wafer suppliers and outsourced assembly and test (OSAT) service providers (collectively, our “Direct Suppliers”), to provide us with information regarding conflict minerals in their respective supply chains. To collect this information, we requested that our Direct Suppliers use the CFSI Conflict Minerals Reporting Template (the “CMRT”), which is a standardized information collection tool. The CMRT allowed us to obtain information from our Direct Suppliers that was important for our due diligence efforts, including the conflict minerals contained in the Direct Supplier’s products and the names of smelters or refiners in the Direct Supplier’s own supply chain. We elected to use the CMRT because it is a commonly used tool that facilitated efficient data gathering and aggregation.

To identify smelters or refiners that potentially processed the conflict minerals contained in our products, we compared the list of smelters or refiners identified by our Direct Suppliers to CFSI’s Conflict Free Smelter Program standard smelter name list (“CSFI Conflict Free Smelter Program List”). We also used the London Bullion Metal Association’s Good Delivery List (the “LBMA List”) for gold refiners. Gold refiners must comply with the requirements of the LBMA Responsible Gold Guidance in order to remain on the LBMA List.

As described in “Designing and Implementing a Response to Identified Risks,” below, we have engaged with our Direct Suppliers by communicating our expectations regarding their due diligence and information reporting efforts in order to improve the information reporting process. In addition, we have been an active contributor to the CFSI.

We have established open lines of communication that serve as grievance mechanisms to provide employees, suppliers and others outside of AMD to report violations of our policies or other concerns. Suppliers and others outside of AMD may contact our conflict minerals team to communicate with us, including to report grievances, via a dedicated email address that is published in our conflict minerals policy and in other communications with our Direct Suppliers. We have also actively participated in the CFSI, which serves as an early warning system by sharing information with participants regarding supply chain risks relating to conflict minerals. In addition, our employees may anonymously report suspected violations using AMD’s AlertLine, available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. AMD’s AlertLine is staffed by non-AMD personnel, who share any information reported with our Corporate Compliance Committee.

Identifying and Assessing Risks in our Supply Chain. To identify and assess risks in our supply chain relating to conflict minerals, we reviewed and aggregated the information contained in the CMRTs received from our Direct Suppliers. We used a conflict minerals software tool to collect and consolidate information received from our Direct Suppliers to minimize errors attributable to manual data entry.

The primary risk that we identified with respect to conflict minerals related to the accuracy and completeness of information contained in the CMRTs that we received from our Direct Suppliers. We received CMRTs with data entry errors, such as missing information and information that appeared inaccurate based on the CSFI Conflict Free Smelter Program List and the LMBA List. In addition, there were smelters or refiners identified by our Direct Suppliers that were not listed on the CSFI Conflict Free Smelter Program List. To address these errors, we made further inquiries of Direct Suppliers that we identified as having provided us a CMRT with data entry errors.

Designing and Implementing a Response to Identified Risks. Our conflict minerals team held regular meetings to review, among other things, our conflict minerals program, any potential or actual risks identified during due diligence and the status of CMRTs received from our Direct Suppliers.

3

As described in “Identifying and Assessing Risks in our Supply Chain,” above, the primary risk that we identified with respect to conflict minerals related to the accuracy and completeness of information contained in the CMRTs that we received from our Direct Suppliers.

Independent Third-Party Audits of Smelter’s and Refiner’s Due Diligence Practices. We did not directly conduct audits of any smelters or refiners in our supply chain. Instead, we relied on third-party audits of smelters or refiners conducted as part of the CFSI Conflict-Free Smelter Program and the LBMA’s Responsible Gold Programme. These third-party audits allowed us to assess whether the smelters or refiners that have been identified by our Direct Suppliers have been reported by the CFSI Conflict-Free Smelter Program as being compliant with its assessment protocols and/or by the LBMA as being compliant with the LBMA’s Responsible Gold Programme (i.e., demonstrated with reasonable confidence that the smelter or refiner processes minerals originating from conflict-free sources). We worked with industry peers, through the CFSI, to encourage smelters or refiners to participate in third-party audits that use the CFSI Conflict-Free Smelter Program assessment protocols.

Publicly Report on our Supply Chain Due Diligence. We have published our conflict minerals policy and our annual corporate responsibility report on the Corporate Responsibility pages of our Web site at http://www.amd.com/en-us/who-we-are/corporate-responsibility. Our Specialized Disclosure Report on Form SD for the reporting period from January 1 to December 31, 2014, which includes this Conflict Minerals Report, has been filed with the SEC and has been made available on the Investor Relations pages of our Web site at www.amd.com or ir.amd.com.

Steps Taken to Mitigate Risk since December 31, 2014

Supply chain due diligence is a dynamic, ongoing process that requires sustained efforts and risk monitoring. Since December 31, 2014, we have taken, and we intend to continue to take, steps to mitigate the risk that conflict minerals in our products benefit armed groups. These efforts have included improvements to our due diligence measures described under “Due Diligence,” above, including continued efforts to strengthen our internal management systems and engagement with Direct Suppliers. We intend to remain an active contributor to the CFSI and to work with industry peers, through the CFSI, to encourage smelters and refiners to participate in third-party audits that use the CFSI Conflict-Free Smelter Program assessment protocols.

Results of Due Diligence

To determine the mine or location of origin of the conflict minerals in our products, we relied on the CFSI Conflict Free Sourcing Initiative’s Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry Data (the “CFSI RCOI Data”). The CFSI RCOI Data provides country of origin information for the raw materials used by smelters or refiners that are reported by the CFSI Conflict-Free Smelter Program as being compliant with their assessment protocols (i.e., demonstrated with reasonable confidence that the smelter or refiner processes minerals originating from conflict-free sources). Based on the CFSI RCOI Data and the smelters or refiners identified by our Direct Suppliers (listed in the tables below), as of May 1, 2015, the countries of origin of the conflict minerals in our products may include:

4

All of the smelters or refiners identified by our Direct Suppliers that were, based on the CSFI RCOI Data, sourcing conflict minerals from the DRC or its adjoining countries (i.e., Level 3 countries) were reported by the CFSI Conflict-Free Smelter Program as being compliant with their assessment protocols (i.e., demonstrated with reasonable confidence that the smelter or refiner processes minerals originating from conflict-free sources).

The information that we received from a majority of our Direct Suppliers was at their company-wide level. Thus, the smelters or refiners identified by our Direct Suppliers contained in the tables below may contain smelters or refiners that processed conflict minerals that our Direct Suppliers supplied to their other customers, but not to us. As a result, we are unable to conclusively determine whether the smelters or refiners included in the tables below were used to process the conflict minerals necessary to the functionality or production of our products during 2014. Because of this uncertainty, we are also unable to conclusively determine whether each of the countries of origin listed above were the country of origin of conflict minerals in our products during 2014, and therefore also unable to conclusively determine the source and chain of custody of those conflict minerals. In addition, the third-party audits conducted by the CFSI, the LBMA and the information that we receive from our Direct Suppliers may yield inaccurate or incomplete information. For example, the information received from our Direct Suppliers may be incomplete because they may not have received accurate and complete conflict minerals information from all of the suppliers in their own supply chain. We also do not have access to audit reports or detailed findings of the third-party audits conducted as part of the CFSI Conflict-Free Smelter Program or the LBMA Responsible Gold Programme and, as a result, are not responsible for the quality of these audits or the audit findings.

The table below lists, as of May 15, 2015, the smelters or refiners identified by our Direct Suppliers that may have been used to process conflict minerals necessary to the functionality or production of our products during 2014 and that have been reported by the CSFI Conflict-Free Smelter Program as being compliant with its assessment protocols and/or by the LBMA Responsible Gold Programme as being compliant with its requirements (i.e., demonstrated with reasonable confidence that the smelter or refiner processes minerals originating from conflict-free sources).

5

Table 1: CFSI Conflict-Free Smelter Program and/or LBMA Responsible Gold Programme Compliant Smelters and Refiners

6

7

8

The table below lists, as of May 15, 2015, the smelters or refiners identified by Direct Suppliers that may have been used to process conflict minerals necessary to the functionality or production of our products during 2014 and that have been validated by the CFSI Conflict-Free Smelter Program as a legitimate smelter or refiner, but that have not been reported as compliant with the CFSI Conflict-Free Smelter Program assessment protocols (i.e., the CFSI Conflict-Free Smelter Program has not reported whether the smelter or refiner processes conflict minerals that directly or indirectly finance or benefit armed group in the DRC or an adjoining country).

Table 2: CSFI Conflict-Free Smelter Program Validated Smelters and Refiners

9

10

No Incorporation By Reference

Information contained on AMD’s Web site is not incorporated by reference in, or considered to be a part of, this Conflict Minerals Report, the Form SD accompanying this Conflict Minerals Report or any other SEC filings made by us.

11